Get Updates!
Membership
Order: Additional Measures to Combat Anti-Semitism
This Executive Order on Combating Anti-Semitism weaponizes civil rights laws to target pro-Palestinian activism, particularly on college campuses. It mandates federal agencies to investigate universities, cracks down on dissent, and authorizes deportations of non-citizens involved in protests. The expansion equates criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism, framing student activists as security threats and threatening free speech nationwide. These executive orders dangerously blur the line between protecting civil rights and suppressing political activism, turning federal agencies into tools for political intimidation.
Key Problems:
Unconstitutional Overreach: Grants the federal government excessive power to suppress political expression, violating First Amendment rights.
Criminalizing Dissent: Labels pro-Palestinian protesters as “jihad sympathizers” and threats to national security, setting the stage for arrests and legal action.
Chilling Effect on Students: Threatens student activists with visa cancellations, deportations, and disciplinary action, silencing advocacy on campuses.
Misuse of Anti-Semitism Definition: Equates criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism, erasing legitimate human rights advocacy and stifling free debate.
Intimidation of Non-Profits & Advocacy Groups: Could lead to investigations, funding cuts, or legal action against organizations supporting Palestinian rights.
Racial & Religious Profiling: Targets Muslim and Arab students disproportionately under the guise of protecting Jewish Americans.
Surveillance & Deportations: Encourages universities to monitor and report foreign students, leading to potential abuses in immigration enforcement.
Order: Establishing and Implementing the President’s ‘Department of Government Efficiency
This Executive Order creates the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to modernize federal technology and software. It renames the U.S. Digital Service (USDS) and places it under the White House, giving it broad access to agency records and IT systems. The order establishes DOGE Teams in federal agencies to implement the administration’s tech agenda, prioritizing data collection, interoperability, and system upgrades. This order expands government surveillance power under the pretense of efficiency, raising serious privacy and civil rights concerns.
Key Concerns:
Constitutionality & Executive Overreach: Centralizes control over federal IT systems within the Executive Branch, bypassing traditional oversight.
Privacy Risks: Grants USDS sweeping access to government data with vague safeguards, raising concerns about mass data collection and surveillance.
Impact on Muslim Americans & Minorities: Could expand government tracking and profiling under the guise of efficiency, disproportionately affecting marginalized communities.
Non-Profit & Civil Society Implications: Could increase data-sharing between agencies, potentially targeting advocacy groups and dissenting voices.
Order: Ending Radical And Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing
This Executive Order misrepresents Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs, eliminates key federal diversity efforts, and weakens protections for marginalized communities. It also disregards the economic benefits of DEI and raises legal concerns about executive overreach.
Key Issues:
Misrepresenting DEI to Justify Elimination: The order falsely claims DEI is “illegal and immoral discrimination” (Sec. 1), ignoring that these programs ensure equal opportunities for historically marginalized communities. It mislabels DEI as harmful and wasteful, while ignoring its proven benefits in workforce productivity, innovation, and public service effectiveness.
Economic Harm & Disrupting Federal Operations: Eliminating DEI programs removes hiring and contracting initiatives that have helped small businesses, women, and minority-owned enterprises (Sec. 2(b)(iii)(B)). DEI training improves workplace efficiency, morale, and talent retention—its removal hurts federal workforce quality and innovation. Additionally, ending environmental justice initiatives (Sec. 2(a)) could negatively impact public health and economic development in vulnerable communities.
Legal & Constitutional Concerns: Federal law, including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, allows for proactive measures to ensure non-discrimination—this order may violate existing equal employment protections. The broad elimination of DEI positions oversteps executive authority by rewriting federal employment policies and contracts without congressional approval.
Targeting Federal Employees & Contractors: The order requires a review of all federal agencies, contractors, and grantees involved in DEI (Sec. 2(b)(ii))—a thinly veiled intimidation tactic against those promoting workplace equity. Singling out Chief Diversity Officers and DEI grants (Sec. 2(b)(i)) disproportionately impacts professionals working to address systemic disparities.
Order: Restoring Freedom of Speech & Ending Federal Censorship
This Executive Order on Free Speech claims to protect First Amendment rights by prohibiting federal agencies from moderating online content under the pretext of combating misinformation. It orders an investigation into past government actions related to content moderation and aims to prevent agencies from working with social media platforms to regulate speech. This order prioritizes unrestricted speech over public safety, making it easier for misinformation and hate to thrive.
Key Issues:
Weaponizing “Free Speech”: Limits efforts to curb misinformation and hate speech online, potentially allowing harmful content to spread unchecked.
Enabling Hate Speech: Weakens protections against online harassment, particularly impacting Muslim Americans and other marginalized communities.
Undermining Efforts to Combat Misinformation: Restricts government responses to election misinformation, public health disinformation, and extremist propaganda.
Chilling Effect on Content Moderation: Pressures social media companies to allow harmful rhetoric, making it harder to combat anti-Muslim, racist, and extremist narratives.
Order: Protecting The Meaning And Value Of American Citizenship
This Executive Order on Citizenship tries to limit birthright citizenship by denying U.S. citizenship to children born in the U.S. if their mother is undocumented or on a temporary visa, unless the father is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident. It directs federal agencies to stop issuing citizenship documents to these children.
Key Issues:
Order: Reevaluating And Realigning United States Foreign Aid
This Executive Order on Foreign Aid halts all new U.S. foreign development assistance for 90 days to review whether aid programs align with the president’s foreign policy. It gives the Secretary of State and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) broad power to determine which programs continue, are modified, or are eliminated.
Key Issues:
Unconstitutional & Executive Overreach: The president cannot unilaterally change or withhold federal funding already approved by Congress. This order attempts to override congressional authority, violating the Constitution.
Destabilizing Global Aid Efforts: A sudden freeze disrupts humanitarian programs, affecting food aid, health initiatives, and disaster relief in vulnerable regions.
Threat to Human Rights & Development Work: Cutting aid based on political alignment risks defunding programs supporting democracy, refugees, and marginalized communities.
Impact on Non-Profits & International Organizations: Groups relying on U.S. funding may face immediate shutdowns, affecting global education, healthcare, and peace efforts.
Selective Political Targeting: Aid programs supporting Palestinian rights, climate action, or reproductive health could be disproportionately cut under the guise of “realigning” with presidential policies.
This order is an unconstitutional power grab that undermines congressional authority and threatens vital humanitarian aid worldwide.
This Executive Order is being called a new Muslim ban because it revives many of the same discriminatory policies as his 2017 travel ban, targeting immigrants from Muslim-majority countries under the guise of “national security.”
key Issues:
Targets Muslim-Majority Countries: The order requires officials to “identify countries” where vetting is “deficient” and recommend suspending entry of their nationals (Sec. 2(b)(i)). This mirrors the original Muslim ban, which disproportionately restricted travel from Muslim countries.
Islamophobic Language: It claims the U.S. must block immigrants who “preach or call for sectarian violence” or aim to “replace the culture on which our constitutional Republic stands” (Sec. 3(d)). This dog-whistle language reinforces the false narrative that Muslim immigrants threaten American culture.
Expands Deportation Powers for “Hateful Ideology”: It allows removal of immigrants who “espouse hateful ideology” (Sec. 1(a))—a vague and dangerous standard that can be weaponized against Muslims, activists, or critics of U.S. foreign policy.
Denies Entry Based on Religious or Political Beliefs: The order bars immigrants who “bear hostile attitudes toward [U.S.] culture, government, institutions, or founding principles” (Sec. 1(b)). This is broad and subjective, punishing Muslims who express political views critical of the U.S.
Discriminates in Refugee Vetting: The order demands extra screening for stateless individuals and refugees (Sec. 3(b))—a group that includes many displaced Muslims from war-torn countries. This treats Muslim refugees as inherently suspicious.
Forces Immigrants to Assimilate: The order mandates officials to “evaluate” immigrant assimilation and promote a “unified American identity” (Sec. 3(f)). This suggests that Muslims and other minorities must prove their loyalty—a violation of religious and cultural freedom.
This executive order revives the Muslim ban under a different name, using national security as an excuse to discriminate against Muslim-majority countries. It violates religious freedom, punishes political beliefs, and unfairly targets Muslim immigrants and refugees.
Order: Protecting The American People Against Invasion
This Executive Order drastically expands immigration enforcement, speeding up deportations, defunding sanctuary cities, and punishing humanitarian aid groups—all under the false claim of an “invasion.”
Key Issues:
Unconstitutional & Violates the INA: The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) gives Congress the power to set immigration laws, not the president. This order bypasses Congress and attempts to rewrite immigration policy through executive action, which is unconstitutional. Federal funding decisions must be made by Congress—Trump cannot unilaterally defund cities or programs he disagrees with.
Threatens Due Process: Calls for mass deportations without hearings, violating legal rights guaranteed under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).
Criminalizes Humanitarian Aid: Cuts funding for NGOs, legal aid groups, and even religious organizations helping migrants.
Encourages Racial Profiling: Empowers state and local police to enforce immigration laws, leading to targeting of Latino, Muslim, and other minority communities.
Devastates the Economy: Industries relying on immigrant workers, like agriculture and healthcare, could face major labor shortages.
Order: Realigning the United States Refugee Admissions Program
This Executive Order suspends the United States Refugee Admissions Program indefinitely, using “assimilation” and “security” as excuses to block vulnerable populations. This order violates religious freedom, ignores U.S. refugee laws, and gives the president unconstitutional control over immigration.
Key Issues:
Targets Muslim & Minority Refugees: The order pauses all refugee admissions until officials determine if entry “aligns with the interests of the United States” (Sec. 3(a)), allowing religious and ethnic discrimination. It gives officials power to approve or deny refugees based on “national interest” (Sec. 3(c)), just like Trump’s Muslim ban.
Forces Refugees to “Assimilate”: Only refugees who can “fully and appropriately assimilate” will be admitted (Sec. 2), forcing cultural conformity. This targets religious minorities and violates First Amendment protections for cultural and religious expression.
Unconstitutional Power Grab: The Refugee Act of 1980 requires the U.S. to accept a set number of refugees each year. The president cannot unilaterally suspend refugee admissions beyond what Congress allows. Section 3(a) lets the president override U.S. law by blocking all refugees under vague claims of national interest—this is unconstitutional. U.S. immigration law does not allow blanket refugee bans, only case-by-case vetting. This order bypasses Congress and violates the separation of powers.
Lets States Block Refugees: The order pushes for state and local governments to reject refugees (Sec. 3(d)), even though only the federal government controls immigration. This allows discrimination, letting states block refugees based on politics or religion.
Memorandum: Expanding Migrant Operations Center at Naval Station Guantanamo Bay to Full Capacity
President Trump’s memo expands migrant detention at Guantanamo Bay (GTMO)—a site infamous for torture and abuse. The Senate Intelligence Committee’s report on CIA interrogations (2014) confirmed waterboarding, sleep deprivation, forced rectal feeding, and other inhumane tactics at CIA black sites, including Guantanamo.
Critics fear it could become a concentration camp for migrants, violating human rights, civil rights, and the Constitution.
Key Issues:
Possible Torture & Human Rights Abuses: GTMO has a history of torture and indefinite detention. Using it for migrants raises fears of cruel treatment. GTMO violates international laws, including the UN Convention Against Torture.
Violates Civil Rights & Due Process: Memo calls migrants “criminal aliens” before trial, assuming guilt without legal hearings. Memo does not mention legal rights of those detained, suggesting indefinite detention without trial, which violates Fifth & Fourteenth Amendment rights.
Unconstitutional Executive Overreach: Immigration law is set by Congress, not the president. Additionally, Guantanamo is outside U.S. jurisdiction, possibly denying detained migrants constitutional protections.
Targets Muslims & Minority Immigrants: GTMO has historically detained mostly Muslims—this expansion risks racial profiling. The memo also calls migration a “border invasion,” fueling militarized, anti-immigrant policies.
This memo revives the worst abuses of Guantanamo, allowing indefinite detention without trial and opens the possibility of targeting Muslims and migrants. It’s a dangerous violation of human rights and U.S. law.
Order: Imposing Sanctions on the International Criminal Court
Trump’s order sanctions the International Criminal Court (ICC) for investigating Israeli and U.S. officials for war crimes, directly undermining Palestinian human rights, international law, and global accountability for war crimes. This is a blatant attempt to shield Israeli officials from justice while falsely equating criticism of Israeli war crimes with anti-Semitism.
Key Issues:
Protecting Israeli War Crimes & Undermining Palestinian Rights: The ICC is investigating Israel’s actions in Gaza, including the killing of thousands of Palestinian civilians. Trump’s order calls these ICC actions “illegitimate and baseless” and falsely claims the court “has no jurisdiction.’ This undermines the ICC’s role in holding war criminals accountable and denies justice to Palestinian victims.
Sanctioning an International Court for Doing Its Job: The U.S. has previously supported the ICC’s prosecution of war crimes in Africa and Eastern Europe, but now hypocritically opposes it for investigating Israel. Trump threatens financial sanctions and visa bans on ICC officials (Sec. 1 & Sec. 4), essentially punishing judges and lawyers for upholding international law.
Criminalizing Criticism of Israel by Labeling It “Anti-Semitic”: The order falsely claims the ICC’s actions “endanger democracies” and threaten Israel’s sovereignty. Holding a government accountable for war crimes is NOT anti-Semitic—it’s a legal and moral obligation under international law. This continues the dangerous trend of equating criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism, silencing legitimate concerns about human rights abuses.
Violating International Law & U.S. Commitments: The ICC has jurisdiction over crimes against humanity, genocide, and war crimes, and Palestine is a recognized member state of the ICC. Trump’s claim that the ICC has “no jurisdiction” ignores the fact that war crimes prosecutions do not require the accused nation’s consent.
The Rome Statute: The Rome Statute, which established the ICC, ensures accountability for all nations—this order violates international legal norms by placing Israel and the U.S. above the law.
President Trump’s order cuts U.S. funding for key UN agencies, including UNRWA, UNHRC, and UNESCO, and threatens broader withdrawals from international treaties. This abandons Palestinian refugees, undermines human rights protections, and isolates the U.S. from global institutions.
Key Issues:
Targeting Palestinian Refugees & Cutting Humanitarian Aid: This order defunds UNRWA, the main humanitarian agency for millions of displaced Palestinian refugees (Sec. 3). It justifies this by claiming UNRWA is linked to Hamas, but provides no evidence (Sec. 1). This leaves refugees without food, healthcare, and education during an ongoing crisis.
Undermining Human Rights Protections: This order withdraws the U.S. from the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) (Sec. 2), a global body that holds Israel and other nations accountable for war crimes. It calls UN agencies “anti-Semitic” for criticizing Israel (Sec. 1), using false claims of bias to shut down accountability.
Threatens U.S. Global Standing & International Law: This order orders a review of all UN treaties and organizations (Sec. 3b), potentially pulling the U.S. out of key international agreements. This could weaken global cooperation on human rights, climate change, and security.
Hate crimes have risen significantly, targeting religious and minority communities, prompting legislative efforts to improve reporting and protections. Emgage Action supports the NO HATE Act…
The U.S. holds 25% of the world’s prison population, disproportionately incarcerating Black men and non-violent offenders due to racial profiling and harsh sentencing laws. Emgage…
Restrictive voting laws disproportionately impact Black, minority, and disadvantaged communities by limiting mail-in voting, ID requirements, and ballot access. Emgage Action…
Post-9/11 counterterrorism policies led to the creation of the Terrorist Watchlist, fueling racial profiling, surveillance, and civil rights abuses against Muslim Americans. Emgage Action urges…
White Supremacy is the greatest domestic threat in the U.S., yet law enforcement disproportionately targets Muslim Americans and communities of color under counterterrorism programs…
Since 2014, India’s ruling BJP and its paramilitary affiliate, the RSS, have promoted Hindutva, eroding secularism and fueling violence against religious minorities, especially Muslims. Emgage Action has…
In 2019, India revoked Kashmir’s autonomy, placing it under direct rule and deploying thousands of additional troops, making it one of the most militarized regions in the world. Emgage Action has…
Emgage Action advocates for Palestinian rights through voter outreach, policy advocacy, and direct engagement with leaders like President Biden, pushing for a ceasefire and addressing Islamophobia…
The Rohingya Muslims, a stateless minority in Burma, have faced brutal persecution, with over 900,000 fleeing since 2017 and many living in overcrowded camps. Emgage Action has advocated for…
The Uyghurs, a Turkic Muslim minority in Xinjiang, China, face intense surveillance and mass internment under the Chinese Communist Party. Nearly three million have been detained in political re-education camps…
Hate crimes have risen significantly, targeting religious and minority communities, prompting legislative efforts to improve reporting and protections. Emgage Action supports the NO HATE Act…
The U.S. holds 25% of the world’s prison population, disproportionately incarcerating Black men and non-violent offenders due to racial profiling and harsh sentencing laws. Emgage…
Restrictive voting laws disproportionately impact Black, minority, and disadvantaged communities by limiting mail-in voting, ID requirements, and ballot access. Emgage Action…
Post-9/11 counterterrorism policies led to the creation of the Terrorist Watchlist, fueling racial profiling, surveillance, and civil rights abuses against Muslim Americans. Emgage Action urges…
White Supremacy is the greatest domestic threat in the U.S., yet law enforcement disproportionately targets Muslim Americans and communities of color under counterterrorism programs…
Since 2014, India’s ruling BJP and its paramilitary affiliate, the RSS, have promoted Hindutva, eroding secularism and fueling violence against religious minorities, especially Muslims. Emgage Action has…
In 2019, India revoked Kashmir’s autonomy, placing it under direct rule and deploying thousands of additional troops, making it one of the most militarized regions in the world. Emgage Action has…
Emgage Action advocates for Palestinian rights through voter outreach, policy advocacy, and direct engagement with leaders like President Biden, pushing for a ceasefire and addressing Islamophobia…
The Rohingya Muslims, a stateless minority in Burma, have faced brutal persecution, with over 900,000 fleeing since 2017 and many living in overcrowded camps. Emgage Action has advocated for…
The Uyghurs, a Turkic Muslim minority in Xinjiang, China, face intense surveillance and mass internment under the Chinese Communist Party. Nearly three million have been detained in political re-education camps…
At Emgage Action, we defend the rights enshrined in the Constitution—due process, freedom of speech, protection from discrimination—and ensure those rights extend to all. We challenge laws and practices that target Muslim, immigrant, and marginalized communities and advocate for a government that treats every individual with dignity under the law.
We oppose unconstitutional surveillance, criminalization of protest, and erosion of civil liberties. Every individual is entitled to a fair and impartial due process under the law—without exception.
Explore Policy →From CVE programs to zoning discrimination, anti-Muslim policies have long been embedded in American politics. We challenge these laws and fight for equal protection without exception or suspicion.
Explore Policy →The greatest domestic threat to our democracy is not foreign—it’s white nationalist violence. We demand policy solutions, not performative condemnation.
Explore Policy →Civic power is a right. We protect Muslim voters and push back against any attempt to dilute the political voice of communities of color.
Explore Policy →At Emgage Action, we defend the rights enshrined in the Constitution—due process, freedom of speech, protection from discrimination—and ensure those rights extend to all. We challenge laws and practices that target Muslim, immigrant, and marginalized communities and advocate for a government that treats every individual with dignity under the law.
We oppose unconstitutional surveillance, criminalization of protest, and erosion of civil liberties. Every individual is entitled to a fair and impartial process under the law—without exception.
Explore Policy →From CVE programs to zoning discrimination, anti-Muslim policies have long been embedded in American politics. We challenge these laws and fight for equal protection without exception or suspicion.
Explore Policy →The greatest domestic threat to our democracy is not foreign—it’s white nationalist violence. We demand policy solutions, not performative condemnation.
Explore Policy →Civic power is a right. We protect Muslim voters and push back against any attempt to dilute the political voice of communities of color.
Explore Policy →Executive Order on Additional Measures to Combat Anti-Semitism
This EO redefines antisemitism to include criticism of Israel, enabling federal monitoring of student protest. It risks violating First Amendment rights by labeling political speech as hate speech, and chilling free expression on campuses.
Executive Order on Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship
This EO denies birthright citizenship to children of undocumented immigrants — in direct conflict with the 14th Amendment, which guarantees citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil. Legal scholars warn this creates a stateless population.
Executive Order on Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs
This EO eliminates all diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives in federal agencies, undermining efforts to address systemic racism. It may violate the Equal Protection Clause and signals retreat from civil rights enforcement.
EO Declaring a National Emergency at the Southern Border
This EO deploys National Guard troops to the U.S.-Mexico border. Critics argue it violates the Posse Comitatus Act and encourages militarization of immigration enforcement without adequate oversight or humanitarian protections.
EO on Protecting the United States from Foreign Terrorists and Other Threats
This EO reinstates the Muslim Ban, blocking travel from several Muslim-majority countries. It raises serious First and Fifth Amendment issues by targeting religion and national origin under vague national security terms.
EO on Protecting the American People Against Invasion
This EO ends DACA protections, threatening the status of over 600,000 Dreamers. It undermines due process and removes protections that courts have previously upheld as lawful and constitutionally grounded.
EO on Safeguarding the Integrity of the Civil Service
This EO introduces loyalty tests and ideological vetting for federal employees. It violates First Amendment freedoms of speech, belief, and association by politicizing the hiring process.
EO on Modernizing and Streamlining Federal Digital Services
This EO creates the DOGE agency — a centralized tech body with expansive access to government data. Privacy advocates argue it violates Fourth Amendment rights by enabling unchecked surveillance.
EO on Promoting Free Speech and Preventing Government Censorship
This EO bars agencies from addressing online misinformation. It creates cover for harmful content, undermining the government's ability to protect public health, elections, and vulnerable communities.
EO on Restoring Law and Order to America's Communities
This EO punishes sanctuary cities by withholding federal funds. Courts have ruled similar efforts unconstitutional under the 10th Amendment, which limits federal interference in state/local governance.
EO on Rebuilding the Immigration Enforcement System
This EO expands ICE powers to conduct raids without warrants. It circumvents Fourth Amendment protections against unlawful search and seizure, putting undocumented people at risk.
EO on Reviewing U.S. Foreign Aid for National Interest Compliance
This EO suspends humanitarian aid for 90 days for ideological review. It violates separation of powers by interfering with Congressional budget authority and threatens lives by withholding essential support.
© Emgage Action 2025
